From THE DAILY EXPOSE ON
It saddens us to report that as a result of being given a Pfizer / BioNTech MRNA vaccine or the Oxford / Astrazeneca Viral Vector (still MRNA technology), a total of twenty women have suffered the grief of a miscarriage and the loss of their unborn child .
Side effects on both shocks reported to the MHRA Yellow Card system by February 21, show that the number almost doubled in just seven days compared to previous weeks’ data that included side effects on both shocks. By February 14, 2021, a total of eleven women had lost their babies, three of which were due to the Oxford vaccine and eight to the Pfizer vaccine.
The data from the MHRA Yellow Card now shows that four women unfortunately lost their unborn child due to the Oxford sting, an increase of one compared to the data from the previous weeks.
As of February 21, a total of 16 women had unfortunately lost their unborn children to the Pfizer sting, a number that has doubled from the eight in the previous week to February 14.
As of February 14, 8.3 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine had been administered, trailing the Oxford shock by 1.4 million with just 6.9 million doses administered. Fast forward to February 21, however, an additional 1.1 million doses of the Pfizer shock and an additional 1.5 million doses of the Oxford shock were administered.
However, the number of side effects on the Oxford Jab is almost twice that of the Pfizer Jab. There were 157,637 side effects reported on the Oxford Jab compared to 85,179 side effects on the Pfizer Jab as of February 21, 2021.
While the Oxford vaccine ranks well above the Pfizer vaccine in terms of side effects, the data now clearly shows that the Pfizer vaccine is much more dangerous when given to pregnant women.
But why is this happening?
Well, when the Pfizer shock was first approved in the UK only for emergency use, meaning the manufacturer will not be held responsible for any damage or injury caused by its product, the advice from the government was as follows:
y There is no or only a limited amount of data, resulting from the use of COVID-19 mRNA – vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed . The COVID-19 mRNA
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. ‘ ‘
“In women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of
childbearing potential should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose .
This emerges from a document published by the government entitled “REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS”, whichwe reported to you back in December 2020 . .
However, thegovernment has updatedits recommendations within the document for the following reasons :
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
There is limited experience with the use of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
Animal studies show no direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
embryo / fetus development, parturition or postnatal development. Administration of the
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 during pregnancyshould only be considered if the potential
benefits outweigh the potential risks to themotherand fetus .
So now we know why pregnant women began to be vaccinated with the experimental shocks because the government tacitly changed their own advice based on zero evidence to support it. In fact, it goes so far as to remove the recommendation that women of childbearing potential should be instructed to avoid pregnancy for at least two months after their second dose.
Statistically, these women had no chance of suffering from a serious illness due to the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus and the allegedly resulting disease Covid-19. Now, unfortunately, they have to suffer the misery of losing their unborn children.
How many more women will have to miscarry to stop this madness?